I don't know if you are purposely being contrary or just obtuse. So are you blatantly ignoring history, context, nuances and sensitivity? So how many white children with blond, red, wavy or straight hair were prevented from attending school for wearing hairstyles that are best fit for their natural hair? How many were denied employment opportunities because of their hair? How many white women were told by their job that their natural hair was considered unkempt, dirty, a distraction or unprofessional? Are there are rules or regulations in place that makes it difficult for them to wear their hair in it's natural state? So how many white women have had their hair chemically altered by their parents at a young age (as young as 2 and 3 years old) because their hair was considered ugly, bad, unmanageable, etc....
See, this is why ppl don't want to deal with (certain) black women. EVERY GOTTAME THING HAS TO BE A CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE.
This is a freaking hair product! It has nothing to do with anyone being kicked out of school, denied access to sit in the front of the bus or denied employment. It is and has been sold in places like ULTA and TARGET for awhile giving
everyone who shops ULTA access to it.
I mean, when was the last time SM showed up at a BLM rally or publicly defended a black child against school discrimination or bailed a wrongly accused somebody out of jail? Did SM ever stand up for Trayvon Martin, Philando Castile or Sandra Bland?
Better yet, when did they ever pledge their undying loyalty to black women and black dollars?
So, whether you like it or not, when it comes to the insignificant things in life, like a hair product, ww have voices and insecurities, too. White women hate their hair, think they're fat and envy bronze skin. And capitalistic ventures are going to cash in on it.
Swear, some of ya'll act like you were married to SM and he just up and divorced you for a white girl. SMDH