The Covid-19 Thread: News, Preparation Tips, Etc

dancinstallion

Well-Known Member

I work daily with patients who have candida auris . There is a whole unit full so as to not mingle them with other patients. It isn't killing the patients. but it is highly contagious and resistant to medications/antifungals. It mainly lives on the skin. That being said I don't take extra precautions (besides a gown) like I did with covid.

If it gets in your bloodstream then yes I can see l it being deadly.
I can see an able bodied person with it, having sex, spreading it, and it is getting in the bloodstream. Vegas would be a good environment for that.
 

Crackers Phinn

Either A Blessing Or A Lesson.
I work daily with patients who have candida auris . There is a whole unit full so as to not mingle them with other patients. It isn't killing the patients. but it is highly contagious and resistant to medications/antifungals. It mainly lives on the skin. That being said I don't take extra precautions (besides a gown) like I did with covid.

If it gets in your bloodstream then yes I can see l it being deadly.
I can see an able bodied person with it, having sex, spreading it, and it is getting in the bloodstream. Vegas would be a good environment for that.
Is this something that a chronic handwasher can avoid?
 

dancinstallion

Well-Known Member
Is this something that a chronic handwasher can avoid?

Yes mainly because it is spread by contact with a person or touching infected items and Surfaces etc.


But I must say that one of the very first cases of C Auris was with an elderly patient isolated in the hospital room for weeks. When the patient died they found c auris everywhere from the ceiling and all on the walls. That's how I first learned about it in 2019. But the health officials say it's not airborne and all of our patients doors are open 24/7. So I think maybe it crawls or the air in the room was blowing the spores around. Idk.
At my It wasn't spreading from room to room but by staff Cross contaminating other patients.

"The man at Mount Sinai died after 90 days in the hospital, but C. auris did not. Tests showed it was everywhere in his room, so invasive that the hospital needed special cleaning equipment and had to rip out some of the ceiling and floor tiles to eradicate it.

Everything was positive — the walls, the bed, the doors, the curtains, the phones, the sink, the whiteboard, the poles, the pump,” said Dr. Scott Lorin, the hospital’s president. “The mattress, the bed rails, the canister holes, the window shades, the ceiling, everything in the room was positive.”

"All the while, the germs are easily spread — carried on hands and equipment inside hospitals; ferried on meat and manure-fertilized vegetables from farms; transported across borders by travelers and on exports and imports; and transferred by patients from nursing home to hospital and back."
 
Last edited:

Evolving78

Well-Known Member
Yes mainly because it is spread by contact with a person or touching infected items and Surfaces etc.


But I must say that one of the very first cases of C Auris was with an elderly patient isolated in the hospital room for weeks. When the patient died they found c auris everywhere from the ceiling and all on the walls. That's how I first learned about it in 2019. But the health officials say it's not airborne and all of our patients doors are open 24/7. So I think maybe it crawls or the air in the room was blowing the spores around. Idk.
At my It wasn't spreading from room to room but by staff Cross contaminating other patients.

"The man at Mount Sinai died after 90 days in the hospital, but C. auris did not. Tests showed it was everywhere in his room, so invasive that the hospital needed special cleaning equipment and had to rip out some of the ceiling and floor tiles to eradicate it.

Everything was positive — the walls, the bed, the doors, the curtains, the phones, the sink, the whiteboard, the poles, the pump,” said Dr. Scott Lorin, the hospital’s president. “The mattress, the bed rails, the canister holes, the window shades, the ceiling, everything in the room was positive.”

"All the while, the germs are easily spread — carried on hands and equipment inside hospitals; ferried on meat and manure-fertilized vegetables from farms; transported across borders by travelers and on exports and imports; and transferred by patients from nursing home to hospital and back."
I learned about this in my pathophysiology course and doing a research paper on hospital acquired infections regarding quality improvement initiatives.
 

Lylddlebit

Well-Known Member
That link goes to something from over a year ago. Am I missing something?
More and more data is coming full circle. The concerns of the risks have been discussed since rollout. A lot of people (not everyone) shouted correlation doesn't equal causation without taking a single statistics class, completing clinical research or writing an abstract/full research document. I wish the UNDERSTANDING (as opposed to repeating what was told) of the correlation-causation concept would have been to applied to analyzing the relationship of genome editing/gene sequencing within one's body more thoroughly when evaluating mrna's vaccine's response to covid-19. Applying the same level of scrutiny for each option was a tool for informed consent.

None if this is new but as the population size/data set increases, there is more data to analyze. So revisiting initial concerns and observations will be relevant. For those "trusting the science", the original hypothesis is always revisited when writing the conclusion. The upcoming years will continue to be a crash course on cause/etiology for those who follow it.
 
Last edited:

PatDM'T

Well-Known Member
Can't read that - they want an email sign up and I'm not doing that - already getting too much spam crap ...
Let me see
if I can
get it for you.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Blood Clotting: FDA​

COVID NEWS
Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber

Dec 17 2022

A health care worker prepares Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine doses in Portland, Ore., in a file photograph. (Nathan Howard/Getty Images)
A health care worker prepares Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine doses in Portland, Ore., in a file photograph. (Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has been linked to blood clotting in older individuals, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

FDA researchers, crunching data from a database of elderly persons in the United States, found that pulmonary embolism—blood clotting in the lungs—met the initial threshold for a statistical signal and continued meeting the criteria after a more in-depth evaluation.

Three other outcomes of interest—a lack of oxygen to the heart, a blood platelet disorder called immune thrombocytopenia, and another type of clotting called intravascular coagulation—initially raised red flags, researchers said. More in-depth evaluations, such as comparisons with populations who received influenza vaccines, showed those three as no longer meeting the statistical threshold for a signal.

Researchers looked at data covering 17.4 million elderly Americans who received a total of 34.6 million vaccine doses between Dec. 10, 2020, and Jan. 16, 2022.

The study was published by the journal Vaccine on Dec. 1.

The FDA said it was not taking any action on the results because they do not prove the vaccines cause any of the four outcomes, and because the findings “are still under investigation and require more robust study.”

Dr. Peter McCullough, chief medical adviser for the Truth for Health Foundation, told The Epoch Times via email that the new paper “corroborates the concerns of doctors that the large uptick in blood clots, progression of atherosclerotic heart disease, and blood disorders is independently associated with COVID-19 vaccination.”

Pfizer did not respond to a request for comment.

comment.

Epoch Times Photo A pedestrian walks by Pfizer’s New York City headquarters in a file photograph. (Jeenah Moon/Getty Images)

How the Research Was Done​

FDA researchers, with assistance from researchers with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), analyzed data from the CMS database. They included Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged 65 or older who received a vaccine within the timeframe, were enrolled when they were vaccinated, and were enrolled for a “clean window” of time prior to vaccination. The window was 183 days or 365 days, depending on the outcome.

About 25 million people receive the Medicare Fee-for-Service, but only about 17 million were vaccinated during the period of time studied.

Researchers used probability testing to detect an increased risk of one or more of 14 outcomes following vaccination. The goal was to see whether vaccination may increase the risk of adverse outcomes, such as pulmonary embolism, or blood clotting in the lungs. If an outcome met a certain statistical threshold, that meant it could increase the risk.

The initial results of the safety monitoring detected an increased risk of four events, the FDA announced on July 12, 2021. They were the same four outlined in the new paper, which is the first update the agency has given on the matter since its announcement.

As of Jan. 15, 2022, 9,065 cases of a lack of oxygen to the heart—known as acute myocardial infarction—were detected, researchers revealed in the new study. As of the same date, 6,346 cases of pulmonary embolism, 1,064 cases of immune thrombocytopenia, and 263 cases of the coagulation were detected.

Epoch Times Photo One of the tables from the new paper.
The primary analysis showed a safety signal for all four outcomes. Researchers tried adjusting the numbers by using different variables. For instance, at one point they adjusted for the variation of background rates, or the rates of each outcome in the general population prior to the pandemic. After certain adjustments—not all—the myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia, and intravascular coagulation ceased being statistically significant.

Pulmonary embolism, though, continued to be statistically significant, the researchers said. Pulmonary embolism is a serious condition that can lead to death.

Limitations of the study included possible false signals and possible missed signals due to factors such as parameters being specified wrongly.

The conditions that didn’t trigger a signal included stroke, heart inflammation, and appendicitis.

The signals were detected only after Pfizer vaccination. Analyses for signals after receipt of the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines did not show any concerns.

Moderna and Johnson & Johnson did not respond to requests for comment.

Side Effects​

All three vaccines have been linked to a number of side effects. Heart inflammation is causally linked to the Moderna and Pfizer shots, experts around the world have confirmed, while Johnson & Johnson’s has been associated with blood clots.

Other conditions, such as pulmonary embolism, have been reported to authorities and described in studies, though some papers have found no increase in risk following vaccination.

Approximately 4,214 reports of post-vaccination pulmonary embolism, including 1,886 reports following receipt of Pfizer’s vaccine, have been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System as of Dec. 9.

As of the same date, 1,434 reports of post-vaccination myocardial infarction, including 736 following receipt of Pfizer’s vaccine; 469 reports of post-vaccination immune thrombocytopenia, including 234 following receipt of Pfizer’s vaccine; and 78 reports of post-vaccination intravascular coagulation, including 42 after receipt of Pfizer’s vaccine, have been reported.

Reports to the system can be made by anybody, but most are lodged by health care workers, studies show. The number of reports are an undercount, according to studies.

The new study states that the FDA “strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection.” No evidence was cited in support of the belief.

The FDA is set to meet with its vaccine advisory panel in January 2023 about the future of COVID-19 vaccines, as the vaccines have been performing much worse against Omicron and its subvariants.

McCullough told The Epoch Times: “A shortcoming of the CMS surveillance system is that it did not capture prior and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection which accentuate the cumulative risk of COVID-19 vaccination. Given the large number of individuals who have been vaccinated, the population attributable fraction of medical problems ascribed to the vaccines is enormous. I have concerns over the future burden to the healthcare system as a consequence of mass indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination.”




Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber
Reporter​
Zachary Stieber is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times based in Maryland. He covers U.S. and world news.​
 

vevster

Well-Known Member
I heard they are starting to create blood banks for unvaccinated blood. I would be happy to donate my unvaccinated blood monthly for the premium fee it deserves.

Isn’t the FDA supposed to be a regulatory agency? Like when the swine flu vaxx was yanked from the market in 1976 after 450 people developed Guillain Barre and anywhere from 3-32 people died? Greed and money has poisoned our institutions. BEWARE.
 
Last edited:

Crackers Phinn

Either A Blessing Or A Lesson.
I heard they are starting to create blood banks for unvaccinated blood. I would be happy to donate my unvaccinated blood monthly for the premium fee it deserves.

Isn’t the FDA supposed to be a regulatory agency? Like when the swine flu vaxx was yanked from the market in 1976 after 450 people developed Guillain Barre and anywhere from 3-32 people died? Greed and money has poisoned our institutions. BEWARE.
:rofl:
 

starfish

Well-Known Member
My husband and I were due to go to Shanghai next week for his business but we canceled about a month ago. A friend of his told him to stay away.

I still cannot believe the number of people walking around with no mask. Or a cloth mask that does nothing against the newest variants. I always think gwon with your bad self. Get the Rona, get the flu, get RSV. It’s such an easy measure to take to
protect yourself. Call us paranoid (we’re both hypochondriacs) but we still kind of act like it’s 2020.
 

dancinstallion

Well-Known Member
I just caught something for 2.5 days where I had itchy throat and deep in my ear,
day 2 it went to sneezing and cough,
Day 3 stuffy and congested nose. That's it.
I don't know what I caught. Dh thinks I drank
too much alcohol in Jamaica and my body was inflamed. Possibly but idk
I took my cocktails/teas/supplements and it helped.
I don't know what I had.
 
Last edited:

PatDM'T

Well-Known Member
I just caught something for 2.5 days where I had itchy throat and deep ear,
day 2 it went to sneezing and cough,
Day 3 stuffy and congested nose. That's it.
I don't know what I caught. Dh thinks I drank
too much alcohol in Jamaica and my body was enflamed. Possibly but idk
I took my cocktails/teas/supplements and it helped.
I don't know what I had.
Glad you fought
it off, whatever
it was.
 
Top