Crackers Phinn
Either A Blessing Or A Lesson.
So, this is a thing that's happening in real time. I have not seen any black blogs discussing this.
During a marathon session lasting almost five hours, the justices heard from a total of five lawyers. Three argued on behalf of Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Two others – both former clerks to Justice Clarence Thomas – argued for the conservative group Students for Fair Admissions behind the challenge.
With a 6-3 conservative-liberal majority, the question may be not whether the court will strike down affirmative action, but how far it will rule.
Takeaways from SCOTUS affirmative action cases: Conservatives may overturn precedent allowing race as a factor in admissions
The Supreme Court is poised to say that colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration in admissions programs, a decision that will likely overturn decades-old precedent and could diminish the number of African American and Hispanic students in higher education.During a marathon session lasting almost five hours, the justices heard from a total of five lawyers. Three argued on behalf of Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Two others – both former clerks to Justice Clarence Thomas – argued for the conservative group Students for Fair Admissions behind the challenge.
With a 6-3 conservative-liberal majority, the question may be not whether the court will strike down affirmative action, but how far it will rule.