vevster
Well-Known Member
Congrats @naturalgyrl5199 !!!!’
So I passed it.
I'm one of only 2 black IBCLCs (International Board Certified Lactation Consultants) in my county-well for my entire 6-county region. The one other black lactation consultant is retiring in the next 3 or so years. Its hard to break into this certification as it is. #FLORIDA
Now for the hard work of bringing more in.
What do you object to about the article?This article uggh
America Is Not Ready for Omicron
The new variant poses a far graver threat at the collective level than the individual one—the kind of test that the U.S. has repeatedly failed.www.theatlantic.com
I just... sigh
Takeaways for me:This article uggh
America Is Not Ready for Omicron
The new variant poses a far graver threat at the collective level than the individual one—the kind of test that the U.S. has repeatedly failed.www.theatlantic.com
I just... sigh
That is sad."(Reuters) -The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Thursday it had received reports of eight cases of myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation, in children aged 5-11 years who received Pfizer and BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine. "
Eight heart inflammation cases among young kids who got COVID-19 shot - U.S. CDC
The CDC had previously said that reporting rates of myocarditis for boys aged 16 to 17 could be more than 69 cases per million second doses administered and around 40 cases per million second doses in boys aged 12-15 years old. The CDC did not say whether it believes there is a link between the...www.yahoo.com
They have already said this is a side effect of the vaccine.That is sad.
Correlation is not causation.
And added a warning to it.They have already said this is a side effect of the vaccine.
No objections, I adore Ed. The facts are just bleak and I know no one, people/government will do what needs to be done for us to get right? Out of the pandemic? I am just disheartened.What do you object to about the article?
Excuse my ignorance
but is the new
rule that if
you tested positive
for Covid-19
and have been
home for 10 days,
you can return
to work without
first getting a
negative test result
as long as you
have no fever
and no symptoms?
How can people
know someone has
no symptoms if
they don't tell
because they really
want to get
back to work?
Headache, sore
throat, fatigue...
Someone please
help me understand
because with recurring
infections and the fact
that one is most
contagious before
symptoms show up,
I do not understand
the logic behind
the aforementioned rule.
My friend's hubby's
job has that policy.
This is similar to the policy at my niece's school but she wasn't actually positive. She was just exposed. You have to quarantine for 10 days from your last exposure or quarantine for at least 7 days with a negative PCR test done at least 5 days after the last exposure. We were hoping to get her back in school in less than 10 days since she tested negative but because she was tested immediately after being exposed (instead of 5 days later) she had to wait and be re-tested. We then waited another 2 days so she could be tested at the school with the oral swab instead of the nasal swab. We didn't realize it wasn't rapid so she still ended up going back after the 10th day anyway. She's already missed about 3 weeks of school because of other classroom exposures.
I can appreciate their diligence with an exposure but it's weird to me that a negative test isn't a requirement. I'm sure there are reasons. It just doesn't sit right with me.
Your daughter's schoolThis is similar to the policy at my niece's school but she wasn't actually positive. She was just exposed. You have to quarantine for 10 days from your last exposure or quarantine for at least 7 days with a negative PCR test done at least 5 days after the last exposure. We were hoping to get her back in school in less than 10 days since she tested negative but because she was tested immediately after being exposed (instead of 5 days later) she had to wait and be re-tested. We then waited another 2 days so she could be tested at the school with the oral swab instead of the nasal swab. We didn't realize it wasn't rapid so she still ended up going back after the 10th day anyway. She's already missed about 3 weeks of school because of other classroom exposures.
I can appreciate their diligence with an exposure but it's weird to me that a negative test isn't a requirement. I'm sure there are reasons. It just doesn't sit right with me.
Thank @yamilee21As @oneastrocurlie mentioned, some unlucky people continue testing positive well beyond the infectious period, which is why negative tests aren’t required for Covid positive cases. For exposed contacts though, a negative test between the 5th and 10th day of the quarantine period is helpful, but after the 10th day is unnecessary, because the vast majority of people who contract Covid after exposure become symptomatic or test positive within 2 to 7 days of exposure, especially with the more recent variants. There have been a few people with very long incubation periods after exposure, but they are so rare that it doesn’t make sense to develop protocols based on the extreme outliers at this point.
Let the church say AMEN.As @oneastrocurlie mentioned, some unlucky people continue testing positive well beyond the infectious period, which is why negative tests aren’t required for Covid positive cases. For exposed contacts though, a negative test between the 5th and 10th day of the quarantine period is helpful, but after the 10th day is unnecessary, because the vast majority of people who contract Covid after exposure become symptomatic or test positive within 2 to 7 days of exposure, especially with the more recent variants. There have been a few people with very long incubation periods after exposure, but they are so rare that it doesn’t make sense to develop protocols based on the extreme outliers at this point.
@BrownBetty, thanks for linking that article. That’s truly the problem in the U.S. - people only concerned about their own ability to fight off Covid, and not caring at all about those they may infect, who may end up seriously ill, or die. It’s the callousness of this indifference that is astounding - as if the immuno-compromised chose to be so, or the elderly simply shouldn’t exist. And it’s delusional, because even though there are some risk factors that have been identified, there is nonetheless a very random aspect to Covid, especially when it comes to “long Covid” and MIS-C.
That seems to be the "rule". I know a few people who tested positive within the last couple of months and that's what their work policy was. My understanding is that you aren't spreading it at that point and you can still test positive for covid long after (I think I've read months after) you've first caught it.