MonPetite
New Member
Imagine being told:
"Your texture is lovely...but...you don't really have the face for that sort of thing. You need the right features for natural hair."
What would your reaction be?
Are their really "right" features for being natural? How can my face not match what my DNA deems should come out of my head?
Could it really be true the way some people can't "play off" certain hair colors that some people can't "work" their natural hair? Does this mean certain women just aren't attractive with their natural texture (WHATEVER that texture may be)? Is that possible?
Please ignore the good hair vs. bad hair debate. This is more a hair-whatever-the-texture vs. the-face-it-frames issue.
What do you ladies think?
"Your texture is lovely...but...you don't really have the face for that sort of thing. You need the right features for natural hair."
What would your reaction be?
Are their really "right" features for being natural? How can my face not match what my DNA deems should come out of my head?
Could it really be true the way some people can't "play off" certain hair colors that some people can't "work" their natural hair? Does this mean certain women just aren't attractive with their natural texture (WHATEVER that texture may be)? Is that possible?
Please ignore the good hair vs. bad hair debate. This is more a hair-whatever-the-texture vs. the-face-it-frames issue.
What do you ladies think?