I find it funny that Andre included texture(coarse) in types 1 and 2 only. Why...I don't know? I'm sure they're are many, for example, 3a's that probably think that they are a 3b because of the texture...and many 3b's that think that they are a 4a because of the texture. IMO when it gets to 3's and 4's hair types and textures are more diverse. Maybe that's why Andre left it alone.
I've been wishing that 3a had it own sub-type(s), 3b it's own, 4a it's own, and 4b it's own...maybe that can help some of us out.
The LOIS system deals with texture. Use it alone or combine the two systems.
Some 4a's have a silkyness too, but when it comes to 3 and 4 the focus is on curl pattern not texture. I don't know why he did that, because texture is important for 3 and 4 hair types too.
The more I view threads like this the more I understand whay some of us are confused about typing and say forget it...but some of us are in straight denial.
Whom ever defined the type 3c...they can't see that that's more of descripition of what some 4a heads looks like. Of course all 4a's don't look exactly alike(because of different textures IMO)...the same goes for all the hair types.
I say stick to one discription...one is enough. Forget about the picture used to describe that discription...because that picture is just one view of what that hair type look like. The more pictures posted the better...one picture is not enough to describe a hair type.
-tru